What is the difference between the Catholic and Protestant Bibles?

Administrator | December 29, 2009

______________________________

Question:
What is the difference between the Catholic Bible and the Protestant Bible?

______________________________

Answer:

Rating: +0

Hi Grace.
Thanks for your participation.
The biggest difference between the two is the inclusion of the “Apocryphal” books in the Roman Catholic versions. These are books that nearly all other Christian groups do not accept as legitimate contributions to the revealed [...]

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Romans 13 and Civil Disobedience

Ken Brown | November 14, 2009

The thirteenth chapter of Romans has been erroneously used to proclaim that all disobedience of one’s government is categorically immoral, contrary to God’s Word, the Bible. Many Bible versions even translate the early verses of this chapter in a manner that clearly conveys this message.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Belief and Logic

Ken Brown | July 4, 2009

In our introduction to Biblical research, the first two principles given for approaching God’s Word were: (1) Believe what you read and (2) think and be reasonable: you can’t throw logic out the window just because you are reading the Bible. Those who can stare a clear scripture in the face and deny what it obviously says because it disagrees with a previously held belief have ceased learning. Likewise, those who can accept two or more contradictory views at the same time will never come to an accurate understanding of God’s Word (or of much of anything else for that matter). On the surface, this seems so obvious to most of you (I hope) that you are probably scratching your heads, wondering why I am making an issue of it. As it plays out in practical application, however, relatively few people are completely consistent about this as it pertains to Biblical exegesis.

As one example, let’s look at 2 Corinthians 5:20, a familiar verse for many of us, but have you ever considered the fundamental problem with how the King James and a number of other versions translate this verse?

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Introduction to Biblical Research

Ken Brown | June 15, 2009

“Biblical research” as the term is used on this blog simply means the study of the Scriptures to gain an accurate understanding of God’s Word and thus His will. It involves a lifetime of learning. No few articles on a web site can tell you all you need to know.

On the other hand, it isn’t rocket science. God never intended for his Word to be complicated, intelligible only to a gifted few. He gave His Word so that all men (and women) might know Him. It is supposed to make sense to you from what you can read for yourself. If you are confronted with a doctrine that seems like you would have to be Einstein to be able to understand or Mother Theresa to be able to relate, take a breath and another look. You are probably being fed a line that is not in the Bible. It isn’t supposed to be difficult.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

No More Conscience of Sins

Ken Brown | April 25, 2009

The Israelites could get forgiven of their sins, but they had to keep coming back to the temple year by year to get forgiven again. If they had had a sacrifice that made them perfect (teleios: lacking nothing necessary to completeness), the Children of Israel would not have needed to offer any more sacrifices; and having been “purged” (cleansed), they should therefore have had no more conscience of sins. The record goes on to say that we DO have such a sacrifice, a one-time sacrifice that perfects us forever.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Who is the Old Man and What is He Doing?

Ken Brown | April 20, 2009

There have been at least two problems with some past common teachings regarding the “old man” referenced in the Scriptures. One has been teachings that have been contradictory: teaching from Romans that the old man is dead, and teaching from Ephesians that we must continually and vigilantly put off the old man. Both cannot be true. The other problem has been a misunderstanding of who or what the “old man” is or was. A common teaching has been that the “old man” is your old sin nature, and the “new man” is your new spirit nature. The Scriptures, however, don’t say that. The purpose of this article is to provide Biblical documentation as to what the story is with the “old man.”

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark
Christian Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory Web Analytics