Creation, Science, and Genesis 1

Ken Brown | November 27, 2009

I was at a wedding reception not long ago, seated next to a man I had not previously met. We exchanged the usual small talk. I learned that he was a retired eighth-grade science teacher. The conversation was pleasant enough until he learned that I am a Bible-believing Christian. Then he launched into an all-out assault. “How can you possibly believe Genesis?” He went on and on about evolution, endeavoring to make a mockery of God’s Word. It takes hundreds of thousands of years for the light from such and such a star to reach the earth. How could God have created the universe only about six thousand years ago? He referred to the Bible as a practical joke.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Why Is God Called Father?

Jane Harvester | October 13, 2009

Why is God called “Father” instead of “Mother” or some other name? It may not be what you think. Find out more about what He is and isn’t, and His heart to love you, here.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Romans on Righteousness (Part One)

Ken Brown | October 3, 2009

“Righteousness” basically means “rightness.” The earliest English versions of the Bible used the word, “rightwiseness.” When Romans speaks of one’s righteousness, or rightness, it refers to one’s rightness before God. It is the condition of being before God as one ought to be. This is not a side note when it comes to right believing. What constitutes being right before God, and why, is as fundamental as it gets.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

What is the Story with 1 John 1:9? (Part Two)

Ken Brown | August 29, 2009

In Part One we examined the contextual evidence showing that 1 John 1:9 is addressed to those not yet born-again and is regarding what they must do to be cleansed of their unrighteousness and come into partnership with God. Part Two will offer further evidence of this truth and examine more fully what the sin of 1 John 1 refers to.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Belief and Logic

Ken Brown | July 4, 2009

In our introduction to Biblical research, the first two principles given for approaching God’s Word were: (1) Believe what you read and (2) think and be reasonable: you can’t throw logic out the window just because you are reading the Bible. Those who can stare a clear scripture in the face and deny what it obviously says because it disagrees with a previously held belief have ceased learning. Likewise, those who can accept two or more contradictory views at the same time will never come to an accurate understanding of God’s Word (or of much of anything else for that matter). On the surface, this seems so obvious to most of you (I hope) that you are probably scratching your heads, wondering why I am making an issue of it. As it plays out in practical application, however, relatively few people are completely consistent about this as it pertains to Biblical exegesis.

As one example, let’s look at 2 Corinthians 5:20, a familiar verse for many of us, but have you ever considered the fundamental problem with how the King James and a number of other versions translate this verse?

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Introduction to Biblical Research

Ken Brown | June 15, 2009

“Biblical research” as the term is used on this blog simply means the study of the Scriptures to gain an accurate understanding of God’s Word and thus His will. It involves a lifetime of learning. No few articles on a web site can tell you all you need to know.

On the other hand, it isn’t rocket science. God never intended for his Word to be complicated, intelligible only to a gifted few. He gave His Word so that all men (and women) might know Him. It is supposed to make sense to you from what you can read for yourself. If you are confronted with a doctrine that seems like you would have to be Einstein to be able to understand or Mother Theresa to be able to relate, take a breath and another look. You are probably being fed a line that is not in the Bible. It isn’t supposed to be difficult.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Have You Ever Wondered about Proverbs?

Ken Brown | May 23, 2009

For those of us who believe that the Bible as originally given, was to holy men of God who were moved by the holy spirit of God to write the inerrant Word of God, we’ve got to consider what the story is with some of the statements in the book of Proverbs.

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Who is the Old Man and What is He Doing?

Ken Brown | April 20, 2009

There have been at least two problems with some past common teachings regarding the “old man” referenced in the Scriptures. One has been teachings that have been contradictory: teaching from Romans that the old man is dead, and teaching from Ephesians that we must continually and vigilantly put off the old man. Both cannot be true. The other problem has been a misunderstanding of who or what the “old man” is or was. A common teaching has been that the “old man” is your old sin nature, and the “new man” is your new spirit nature. The Scriptures, however, don’t say that. The purpose of this article is to provide Biblical documentation as to what the story is with the “old man.”

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark

Two Natures? (Part One)

Ken Brown | April 20, 2009

Are there two “natures” alive and well in each child of God, an old sin “nature” and a new Godly “nature”, each actively pulling the believer one direction or the other? E. W. Bullinger (1837-1913) thought so, though the other great “E. W.,” E. W. Kenyon (1867-1948) disagreed. (See pages 153 and following of The Father and His Family.)

  • PrintFriendly
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • BuddyMarks
  • Bebo
  • Propeller
  • Shoutwire
  • Jumptags
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Connotea
  • Folkd
  • Blinklist
  • Ask.com MyStuff
  • Google Reader
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Windows Live Spaces
  • Delicious
  • AOL Mail
  • AIM
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Hotmail
  • BibSonomy
  • Share/Bookmark
Christian Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory Web Analytics